However, then more bad news arrived. Harald Hardrada had arrived in the north. Harold then had to make an important decision: In the end he had no choice but to go up north and defend that part of the country.
The English fought a great battle, and thrashed Harald. However, in their absence, the winds over the channel changed, and the Normans arrived on the coast, well prepared, well rested, and ready to fight.
Also, many of them were wounded,. They also created a wall of shields to block any potential arrows that could be coming their way; a clever strategy. In the beginning the battle was going well for Harold and his army, who from their position and wall of shields, were at least able to block the advances of the other side.
However, the Normans soon came up with a clever plan, and pretended to retreat, causing the English to chase them, losing their hill position AND wall of shields. As soon as they were off the hill, the Normans turned around and started to attack. The English, being tired and injured, were already weak and could barely withstand this attack.
Then rumours went round claiming that Harold Godwin, their leader, was dead, shot down by an arrow in his eye. This was the turning point. It was then that his troops started to retreat, or at least what was left of them. Throughout the battle, William managed to keep his army under control which was one of the key reasons why he won the battle. Another key reason why the battle was won by William was because he had luck on his side. The winds changed at just the right time when Harold was fighting Harald in the north allowing for William to arrive at an unguarded shore; this gave him time to rest and prepare.
Having the Pope on his side gave William self-belief and confidence. The pope also gave William men for his army. During the fighting in the north — The Battle of Stamford Bridge — Harold lost some of his best men, and the rest were fatigued when it came to fighting William and his army. Eventually, the shield wall broke and the whole Saxon army, engulfed by the Normans, were being slaughtered by the minute.
Along with his strong leadership and good luck, William won the battle due to his amazing preparation skills. William had organised an army of knights on horseback and fully trained men and unlike Harold, William had archers with him that could kill people from long distances.
Harold made a crucial mistake — he did not look after his men, and this went in Williams favour. William was well prepared and his plans were well thought out, but there was something more that helped him win the battle… Tactics! William planned and arranged for his army to battle in rows so they could move easily; unlike the Saxons who were all clumped together.
In conclusion, I can see that a combination of factors helped William win the Battle of Hastings. So, without William leading, the army could have been full of untrained, unprepared and tired men and the outcome of The Battle of Hastings could have been very different.
Army is a great organization and is even more dignified through designation as a Profession of Arms. Every great organization has an even greater human resource management as the cornerstone of operations. The paper will identify and explain the purpose and actions of any four phases of the Army Organizational Life Cycle Model AOLCM by providing a hypothetic example to illustrate how the process works.
The My Lai massacre was a mass murder of innocent Vietnamese civilians. It is known as the worst atrocity of the Vietnam War. The war of Texas independence otherwise referred to as Texas revolution was fought from to The war was between Mexico and settlers living in Texas which was a portion of the larger American state.
There was growing animosity between Mexican government and American settlers who were living in Texas and Mexican ancestry Tejas. The war was sparked off by the Siete Leyes in Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website.
Battle of Hastings. Battle of Hastings took place on 14 th October It was a battle between the English Army led by Anglo-Saxon King Harold II and the Norman-French Army led by Duke William II of the Normandy. This battle was fought during the conquest of Norman of England.
Sep 06, · We offer a wide variety of writing services including essays, research papers, term papers, thesis among many others. We have a lot of experience in the .
William had more cavalry who wore chain mail armour and fought with spears and bow and arrows. This was an advantage to William because Harold had a few house carts and the rest were all farmers who he picked up on the way to the battle of Hastings, also Harold's men had to fight with spears and battle axes. The Battle of Hastings In October 14th the battle of hastings was fought between an English army under the leadership of Anglo Saxon king Harold and the Norman French army of the duke of Normandy,mcq2ytpwjv172.gang the Norman conquest of England, it took about eleven kilometer northwest of hasting, close to the present day mcq2ytpwjv172.ga Noman took home victory.
Find free term papers, free essays online and other academic papers for colleges/universities on this mcq2ytpwjv172.ga battle of Hastings was held 10km away from Hastings itself and was fought at Senlac . In this essay I will be saying why William the Duke of Normandy won the battle of Hastings. I will be including these points: Williams’s good leadership, luck, preparation and tactics. One very important point as to why William won the battle of Hastings, was because William was a skilful, brave and determined leader who kept his army disciplined and under control.